About Me

Name: lge
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Blog Roll

Of Mexicans, Traitors, and Surrender Monkeys

Posted by lge on Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:37:03 AM

================================
News Item:
France gets tough on illegal immigration, setting quotas for arrests, expulsions
By Associated Press
Monday, June 4, 2007 - Updated: 04:53 PM EST

PARIS - France set tough new quotas for the number of illegal immigrants authorities should arrest and expel each month, the new immigration minister said Monday.
==================================

I guess that makes US the new cheese-eating surrender monkeys. France has the guts to do something, while all our politicians can do is invent high-minded reasons why nothing can and should be done.

This administration has the guts to send armed forces halfway around the world to battle "insurgents" and referee an intramural war, but they don't have the guts to keep our homeland from being taken over by third-world invaders. If they tried, somebody might call them "racist"!
 
 -- Somebody like Linda Chavez, Geraldo Rivera and the rest of the Hispanic fifth column. They root for the cause of Hispanics, not the United States. They want to get as many Hispanics in this country as possible, to wield power and transform our culture. So they resort to character assassination and call their opponents "racists." But what are their OWN racial motives?
 
And Ted Kennedy -- he's been working to destroy this country for decades. He apparently hates our white, Christian, European heritage and wants to drown it with Africans, Asians, Hispanics, Muslims -- anything but what we have been historically. He makes huge promises every time he gets a bill passed importing the Third World into this country. 
 
With friends like these traitors, who needs enemies?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel and Kassam Rockets

Posted by lge on Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:31:53 AM
Israel has adopted what I think is its best strategy for dealing with Arab aggression: separate themselves from the Arabs, and exclude as many Arabs as possible from Israel -- even if it means giving up land like Gaza in order to get rid of them. Wall them off, and go about your own life without having to fool with an alien, hostile  people. It is plain that "negotiations," the Arab catalog of grievances, all the folderol of endless U.N. yammering, is irrelevant.

BUT, once the Israelis wall off the Palestinians, they are still faced with Kassam rockets, which come OVER the wall. To combat those, I think Israel will have to resort to a tactic that previously has been considered beyond the pale of civilized behavior.

Since the rockets are random terror, and since it is impossible to actually kill the exact people who launch the rockets -- they can get away too quickly -- Israel may have to start responding in kind. When some Palestinian launches a rocket which will come down in some approximate neighborhood in Israel -- he doesn't know exactly where --  then Israel should launch a few rockets or cruise missiles which will come down in the approximate neighborhood from which the rocket was launched -- it doesn't have to be exactly the right place.

In other words, respond to terror with terroristic methods. Israel may not kill the actual perpetrators, but sooner or later the tactic will bring on a "not in my back yard," NIMBY effect: "No launching Kassam rockets around here! We don't want an Israeli air strike! Mamma don't allow none of that around here." Give the Palestinians some "incentive" to support peace.

It's grim, it's terroristic -- but it may be what Israel has to do in order to be left alone and survive. If someone has to be killed, let it be those who won't leave their neighbors in peace.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Realio, Truelio Cause Of The Arab/Israeli Conflict

Posted by lge on Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:08:22 AM
Sometimes one question leads to another. For instance, Why does Ahmadinnerjacket want to nuke Israel? That leads to a larger question, Why do ALL the Arabs want to wipe out the Jews?

Forget "Israel's occupation of Palestine." Forget "Israel's independence in 1948." Forget "parsing" this cause or that cause, this grievance or that grievance; the Arabs ALWAYS want to have a grievance, and if it's not one thing, it's another. I really, truly believe it all goes back to Jacob and Esau.

Two brothers, twins in fact, are born, but "Jacob have I loved" and Esau have I hated. Badda-boom, Bob's your uncle-- instant  Arab/Jew hatred, going all the way back to Old-Testament times. The  Jews are God's chosen people, and the Arabs are also-rans. And so an enormous load of envy, jealousy and hatred is bred into the bones of the seed of Esau! It's in the blood, and it's not coming out, no matter how much territory Israel cedes to the Palestinians.

Sometimes it seems Islam is a medieval, heathen, bloodthirsty pseudo-religion. But it's not medieval. It goes back way farther than that. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"A Nation Of Immigrants"?

Posted by lge on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:23:00 PM
This is the catch-phrase of the decade, the all-explanatory and all-excusing slogan: We're a nation of immigrants. That's the suck-up left-wingers' way of saying, "We have no right to say who we shall be. We're helpless to determine the destiny of our own nation."

Maybe, in some tenuous sense, if you go back far enough, we are a nation of immigants. But note that first noun: we're a NATION. That means we have a right to determine who will be allowed to come here and settle here. WE decide, not every Mexican, African, Guatemalan, Chinaman and what have you who thinks he can decide for himself to come here.

We're also a nation of colonists, if you go back far enough. But we're all grown up now -- we're no longer a colony. We make our own laws -- Mexicans don't make them for us.

And more accurately, we're a nation of Western-European, white Judeo-Christian immigrants. Our common understanding is the Ten Commandments and the law of Moses. Such people are "our sort."  We can use all of those we can get.

Others are a distraction, people who have no sympathy with our country and its basic assumptions. They oppose our country and weaken it -- we don't need them.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Amnesty By Any Other Name Stinks

Posted by lge on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 5:32:41 PM
Count on our Congress to argue an important matter in infantile terms. Is the proposed law that will allow illegal immigrants to stay an "amnesty"? Or is it a reward for criminality that should be called by some OTHER name?

What's in a word? An amnesty by any other name would stink so bad.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't Blame The Messenger

Posted by lge on Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:11:26 PM
How the lefties are reviling the late Reverend Falwell! Their hatred of him always was a classic case of blaming the messenger.

He told the perverts that what they do is an abomination before the Lord. Well, the truth hurts. It wasn't Jerry Falwell who determined that homosexuality is an abomination -- God did that.

But when you tell the perverts they're on the wrong path, well of course you get buckets of filth poured over you. That happened in the matter of Larry Flynt, and his vile caricature of Falwell. Reverend Falwell (a genuine reverend with a church, not an imposter like Sharpton and Jackson) is despised and rejected by our left-wing or "liberal" populace, while an vile piece of filth like Flynt is honored with a movie.

Falwell is called "divisive" -- meaning he argues against the lefties' message. But then again, I heard Kathy Griffin, second-rate comedian, call Jesus "divisive"! That's a moral cretin for you!

Rev. Jerry Falwell spoke in contradiction against the main, number-one, essential cherished credo of liberals -- that there is no God and no standards of personal morality, and that the path to virtue is agitation for politically-correct social changes. The Gospel opposes that creed, and thus so did Falwell's sermons. For that, he earned the undying hatred of the left-wing heathen -- as, presumably, did God Himself.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gay Teletubbies and Homosmurfuals

Posted by lge on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 4:32:25 PM
The late Jerry Falwell was ridiculed "for pointing out how a children's character  [ a Teletubby]  on a PBS show appeared gay -- though gay rights advocates had earlier made the same observation...."

It wasn't just that one Teletubby who was depicted as gay.  (And if anybody thinks PBS is above propagandizing little kids to make them think perversion is normal, he'd better get his head examined for cracks.)

But there was also a Smurf who had mannerisms, a way of talking, a flamingly swish personality, that always made me think he should be carrying a Smurf-purse. He was definitely a Smurfosexual, or Homosmurfual.

It's ironic -- lefty broadcasters stoop to the degraded, cretinous, abysmal depths of inculcating the "perverts are normal" message in kiddie programs -- then they excoriate Rev. Falwell for noticing and objecting! These latter-day Goebbels's should just slink into the woodwork from shame.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Matthews & Russert -- Dueling Jack-O-Lanterns

Posted by lge on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 4:21:08 PM
Did you see those two -- Chris Matthews and Tim Russert -- together on one show? You never saw such a pair of grinning jack-o-lanterns in your life! (I almost misspelled "Russert" as "Russett" -- I guess because subliminally I think he's Mr. Potato Head.)

And you never saw such a pair of phony "newsmen" so far in the bag for Democrats in your life, either.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Francis Fukuyama's smell-o-rama

Posted by lge on Friday, May 11, 2007 8:54:35 PM
A lot of discussion, argumentation, debate, and deep thinking has gone under the bridge (and down the drain) since Francis Fukuyama published "The End of History." In fact, far more of it than that feeble, half-witted tome deserved.

According to Fukuyama, with the demise of Communism, there was nothing left to fight about and we'd all walk hand in hand apace into a brighter future. As one reviewer phrased it, "history, conceived of as the clash of political ideologies, is at an end."

That might have happened, if human nature had totally revolutionized itself, and if people had suddenly become radically different from what they had been throughout human history.  If men were suddenly  angels instead of fallen, sinful creatures, then we'd all be drinking that free Bubble-Up and eating that rainbow stew. Otherwise, no.

Fukuyama reminds me of Patent Commissioner Charles H. Duell, who said in 1899 that "everything that can be invented has been invented." That's just stupidity and lack of imagination. Because you can't imagine what the next new invention will be, you decide there can be no invention? Or because you can't imagine what the next maniacal bloodthirsty creed will be that sets people to murdering their neighbors, you decide that no such bloodthirsty creed can arise?

That's not WORTH reviewing. It's just juvenile stupidity and lack of imagination.

(Especially since the latest bloodthirsty creed is a previous, already-seen bloodthirsty creed! It's the Saracens, Part Deux.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Death By Lethal Injection

Posted by lge on Sunday, May 06, 2007 7:16:19 PM

The sanctimonious leftists pretend they don't like the death penalty because it causes  pain. But they actually don't like the death penalty because they don't like the very IDEA of good and evil, virtue and sin. Thus they oppose the very idea of judicial punishment, and instead of punishment, they favor removing the "root causes" of crime, mayhem, and general havoc-raising. In other words, "Instead of punishing the criminal, let's remake all of society to make it perfect."

To minimize their phony objections to the death penalty, I favor my new, stupendous, revolutionary invention: dispatch the condemned man by microwaving his head.

You get a machine kind like a steam-cabinet in reverse -- just the convict's head protrudes into the cabinet, the body is outside. The cabinet is a microwave oven. Just put it on "High," or "Medium," or even "Defrost" -- I don't care. Microwave the sucker's head, and in less time than it takes to get a bucket of microwave popcorn, Presto! Cooked convict!

Whadda ya think?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »