About Me

Name: lge
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

"Perez Hilton" apologizes, but not for being a cockroach


Perez Hilton apologizes for using a gay slur --  "fa**ot" (rhymes with "maggot").

Of all the things he could have apologized for, he chooses that! He regretted the possibility that his choice of words might bring discredit on his noble "cause" of portraying sexual perverts as perfectly normal, respectable people.

He could have apologized for his rotten-little-kid habit of drawing penises on photos of female celebrities. He could have apologized for imposing his own perverted political views as mandatory for all beauty-contest hopefuls. He could have apologized for being a would-be petty dictator. Or for being a sanctimonious guttersnipe. Or for being a filthy crawling insect. But he picks the bad word he used, which might reflect badly on deviants.

Because that's the kind of filthy Yahoo he is.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Forget "wise" -- what about a stupid Latina woman?


Sotomayor thinks a "wise Latina woman" will render better judgment than a whitey. OK, so what about a stupid Latina woman? One who wouldn't even have gotten into law school if it hadn't been for affirmative action? One who thinks it's OK to side corruptly with her own pet demographic group from the bench, saying to Hell with the law, the facts, justice, and the Constitution? What about that Latina?

We already had one racist moron on the Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall. He too was an affirmative-action dummass, and he saw his role as to give the black party to any case coming before him, just what they wanted. He was there to enforce and institutionalize his own stupid, thuggish bigotry.

Sotomayor is made from the same mold.  We don't need another racist anti-white moron on the Court, to flog Whitey and put him (us) in his place..

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Parrots The party Line On Iran

The Party Line on Iran has been circulating for awhile, and Obama has now latched onto it. From my blog, September 30, 2007:

The question of Iran now comes down to, "Who will bell the cat?"

Everyone knows it must be belled. Iran can't be allowed to get nuclear weapons. And Iran won't renounce them voluntarily. So SOMEBODY has to act, to destroy Iran's nuclear program.

Of course, fatuous lefties in this country bleat, "Iran has as much right to develop nuclear weapons as any other country." In a petty-fogging, legalistic way, that's true. . . .

What nations guide their actions by is not some abstract or hypothetical international law, but their own national interests. And it is not in our interests, nor in Israel's, to allow a lunatic who has vowed to nuke Israel, to develop nuclear weapons.

The cat must be belled, but the question remains, "Who will do it?"

So that sucker-bait has been in circulation at least since 2007: "Iran has a legal right to get nukes." It's an exceptionally stupid, but pious-sounding slogan -- thus it's just right for Obama! He doesn't want to do anything about Iran, he sympathizes with all Muslin and non-white nations, he has the black bigoted demagogue's inbred hostility to Jews, and so he has no intention of helping Israel stave off destruction. Therefore he trots out this petty-fogging legalistic argument devised by the Left to excuse his lack of action: "They have a legal right," yadda, yadda yadda.

This lying hypocrite is ruling our country for his OWN interests and purposes, and conniving and manipulating the American peopleto keep them from catching on.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are they terrorists, or kittens?


News Item: 
Palau Agrees to Take Uighur Gitmo Detainees 
By Mike Levine  FOXNews.com
The South Pacific island nation of Palau has agreed to "temporarily resettle" the 17 Uighurs, or Chinese Muslims, currently being held at Guantanamo Bay.


Palau agrees to take Uighur detainees? What the Hell are they -- kittens, or prisoners of war?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »